From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 31.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.62.10]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PdOwQ-0005Zr-AY for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:18:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 20312 invoked by uid 503); 13 Jan 2011 15:52:25 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail173.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 31.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 15:52:24 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 17:17:49 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 17:17:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4D2F179D.4060701@eukrea.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:17:49 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1294867230-7827-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <4D2E47AE.5060803@mentor.com> <4D2EAC19.6020203@eukrea.com> <4D2F16B4.4090107@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4D2F16B4.4090107@mentor.com> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 1701516236065516873 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] strace: add patch allowing compilation with kernel headers >= 2.6.32 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:18:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 13/01/2011 16:13, Tom Rini wrote: > On 01/13/2011 12:39 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: >> On 13/01/2011 01:30, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: >>>> tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. >>> >>> Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead? >>> >> I would like to do that but I don't know if 4.5.20 needs patches. > > I haven't tried .37, but it doesn't for .34 (when .14 does). To be clear, I'm > suggesting we look at removing the D_P = -1 from .20. My assumption is that > since .20 is the latest it probably doesn't need ARM EABI patches (and > probably not the SH patches either). > OK lets go Eric