From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6993162175813270918==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Denis Kenzior Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] stk: Handle Launch Browser proactive command Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:35:46 -0600 Message-ID: <4D2F29E2.403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============6993162175813270918== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jeevaka, On 01/13/2011 08:56 AM, Jeevaka.Badrappan(a)elektrobit.com wrote: > Hi, > = >>> >>> So a question about this. Why are we checking the netreg atom? >>> Shouldn't we be checking the gprs atom's attached property? But this >>> brings up an even more interesting question, do we even need to >>> assume that we have to be attached to the cellular network to >>> perform these operations? We could in theory go over wifi. >> >> I agree that the modem online property is unrelated to this. >> Also the card may in theory specify a URL that designates a >> local file or something on a local network, not the internet. >> > = > Agree. It can be anything not only cellular network. Do we need > to check the bearer parameters in that case or can I just remove the > current check code? Good point on the bearer parameters. My take is that we should either ignore the bearer parameters or return not-capable if they're set. Otherwise removing the current checks in the code seems reasonable to me. Regards, -Denis --===============6993162175813270918==--