From: Jean Baptiste Favre <xen-devel@jbfavre.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: PCI passthrough issue
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:18:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2F5009.2090701@jbfavre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2EE1DE.5070006@jbfavre.org>
Hello,
My dom0 is back and I performed some more tests.
I told in my first mail that ping works. Indeed it works, but not always:
# ping -c2 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.846 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.824 ms
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.824/0.835/0.846 ms
# ping -c2 -s60 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 60 data bytes
68 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.819 ms
68 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.807 ms
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.807/0.813/0.819 ms
Increasing packet size is ok until this one:
# ping -c2 -s85 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 85 data bytes
93 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.823 ms
93 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.816 ms
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.816/0.819/0.823 ms
root@OpenWrt:/# ping -c2 -s86 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 86 data bytes
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
As you see, packet size seems to be limited in a way. From another
machine on the same LAN I can do ping -s1500 without any problem.
So I think I hit a bug. Either it's Xen related, or Debian (through
debian kernel version). Now the question is: how can I determine which
part is responsible ?
Regards,
JB
Le 13/01/2011 12:28, Jean Baptiste Favre a écrit :
> Have had a look on both tcpdump captures.
> 1. From the OpenWRT domU: nothing special. Lot of STP traffic due to my
> network architecture. Don't thing this could be the cause of my problem
> since I'm always able to reproduce the failure whatever could be the
> order of DNS requests. Don't see "big" DNS answers coming in, see
> multiple requests before timeout.
>
> 2. From my gateway: nothing special here too. Same STP traffic (have
> checked GW network setup as well). See each DNS requests my domU sent
> and can see as well answers, which are not received by domU. No strange
> ARP traffic.
>
> I wanted to change the network, thinking about a bogus driver (never
> know). My Dom0 has crashed during reboot and I've no way to remotely
> reboot it (no remote power control and it seems that Magic SysRQ are not
> transfered through my Putty/screen connection).
>
> Will reboot it when at home and continue investigation with another
> network card and maybe another operating system to check if bad
> behaviour is still there.
>
> Regards,
> JB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-13 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 15:38 PCI passthrough issue Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 15:53 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:09 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 16:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 17:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 17:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 18:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 20:07 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 21:46 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 22:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 11:28 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 19:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre [this message]
2011-01-13 20:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-13 20:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-14 14:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 23:29 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 8:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 13:58 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-22 10:22 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-27 20:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 21:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-28 15:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 11:34 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 12:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 13:20 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 14:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 14:18 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 15:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 19:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-01 22:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:12 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 23:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:44 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-02 15:55 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 22:04 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 10:24 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 10:59 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 11:33 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-04 8:43 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 8:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 8:54 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 10:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:04 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 11:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:28 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 13:15 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 13:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 14:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-09 9:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-18 21:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-25 14:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 10:00 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 12:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 15:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 15:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
[not found] ` <4D6CB851.40103@jbfavre.org>
2011-03-03 22:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-03 22:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-03 22:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 7:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-16 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-25 13:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 16:16 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2F5009.2090701@jbfavre.org \
--to=xen-devel@jbfavre.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.