From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932978Ab1AMVzk (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:55:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56933 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932498Ab1AMVzd (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:55:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4D2F74B0.6030206@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:54:56 +0100 From: Milan Broz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101213 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alasdair G Kergon , Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] core block bits for 2.6.38 References: <4D2F03A7.2030809@fusionio.com> <20110113192152.GA18217@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> <4D2F5353.3000400@fusionio.com> <20110113214308.GA18104@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110113214308.GA18104@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/13/2011 10:43 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> I see Tejun already posted a fix, but Milan says it does not work. >>> Tejun, any updates? >> >> Hmmm... seems like I missed something. Unfortunately, it's already a >> bit too late here. I'll get back to it tomorrow afternoon. The issue >> is mostly cosmetic so if it can wait a day or two I don't think >> reverting is necessary. > > It's only cosmetic if your system is not relying upon userspace programs > that rely upon it:) My vote would be for reverting the patch for now > so we can be sure the existing userspace functionality continues to work > in -rc1. It is not cosmetic, it breaks core lvm functionality, see my lvresize test case in the reporting thread. Sorry, but this should be fixed soon or reverted... http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/31164 I thought it is just warning but when testing the fix it shows that the problem is worse than warning. Milan