From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: reduce NF_VERDICT_MASK to 0xff Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:33:21 +0100 Message-ID: <4D31B031.9020304@trash.net> References: <1293407904-31464-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> <1293407904-31464-5-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> <4D2DFAC5.8020802@netfilter.org> <20110112205216.GC10801@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <4D305836.8080007@trash.net> <4D31AF2E.8030305@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:58777 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103Ab1AOOdZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:33:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D31AF2E.8030305@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 15.01.2011 15:29, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso: > On 14/01/11 15:05, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>>> >>>> +/* NF_VERDICT_BITS should be 8 now, but userspace might break if this changes */ >>>>> >>>> +#define NF_VERDICT_BITS 16 >>>>> >>>> #endif >>>> >>> >>>> >>> i don't find any use of this in user-space. >>> >> >>> >> Alright, I will simply remove it, then :-) >> > >> > I think we should still keep it around in the compat section, >> > just because we don't know of any userspace code using this >> > doesn't mean it doesn't exist. > Yes, that's true, but I don't fine any sane use of that macro in userspace. > Well, as Florian said, using (queue_nr << NF_VERDICT_BITS) in userspace is a valid use when reinjecting packets.