From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramsay Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] svndump.c: Fix a printf format compiler warning Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:06:27 +0000 Message-ID: <4D31E223.3080001@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> References: <4D2C9EB1.2050100@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <20110111183927.GF15133@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , GIT Mailing-list , David Barr , Ramkumar Ramachandra To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 15 19:15:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeAf0-0006iP-Hb for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:15:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753303Ab1AOSHn (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:07:43 -0500 Received: from lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.150]:49853 "EHLO lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752145Ab1AOSHm (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:07:42 -0500 Received: from ramsay1.demon.co.uk ([193.237.126.196]) by lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1PeAWv-0006lJ-fJ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:07:41 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) In-Reply-To: <20110111183927.GF15133@burratino> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ramsay Jones wrote: > >> --- a/vcs-svn/svndump.c >> +++ b/vcs-svn/svndump.c >> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ void svndump_read(const char *url) >> if (key == keys.svn_fs_dump_format_version) { >> dump_ctx.version = atoi(val); >> if (dump_ctx.version > 2) >> - die("expected svn dump format version <= 2, found %d", >> + die("expected svn dump format version <= 2, found %"PRIu32, >> dump_ctx.version); > > Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder Thanks! > I think we should just use "int", but that is a wider sweeping change > for another time. Thanks. > > Does gcc or sparse provide a warning that could have caught this > mistake? None that I know of, no ... :( ATB, Ramsay Jones