From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anish Patel Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:35:06 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] LM94 Message-Id: <4D31E8DA.7000503@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1502163622766309727==" List-Id: To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1502163622766309727== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090401030200090804030000" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090401030200090804030000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello All, I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command /echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device /Thanks Anish --------------090401030200090804030000 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello All,

I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device


Thanks
Anish


--------------090401030200090804030000-- --===============1502163622766309727== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors --===============1502163622766309727==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 06:58:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] LM94 Message-Id: <20110116065806.GA27859@ericsson.com> List-Id: References: <4D31E8DA.7000503@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D31E8DA.7000503@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote: > Hello All, > > I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command > echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device > I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure if that would be a good idea. Thoughts anyone ? Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:02:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] LM94 Message-Id: <20110116110214.693f98b5@endymion.delvare> List-Id: References: <4D31E8DA.7000503@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D31E8DA.7000503@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:58:06 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command > > echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device > > > I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that > the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure > if that would be a good idea. > > Thoughts anyone ? As long as the current set of features supported by the lm93 driver work OK with the LM94, I have no objection (and would even encourage it). Anybody interested in the extra features can add them later. You can simply have the driver print a notice at bind time that some features are unsupported. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors