diff for duplicates of <4D33F8E7.5030900@bfs.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index caf099b..d7d90fd 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Am 15.01.2011 17:54, schrieb Dan Carpenter: >> >> Am 15.01.2011 15:04, schrieb Dan Carpenter: >>> The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if ->>> someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is +>>> someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc == 1). The current code is >>> fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse >>> complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this: >>> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7d5ee33..b8451e0 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\020110115165401.GE2721@bicker\0" "From\0walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [patch] [SCSI] target: dubious one-bit signed bitfield\0" - "Date\0Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:08:07 +0000\0" + "Date\0Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:08:07 +0100\0" "To\0Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>" Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ ">>\n" ">> Am 15.01.2011 15:04, schrieb Dan Carpenter:\n" ">>> The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if\n" - ">>> someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is\n" + ">>> someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc == 1). The current code is\n" ">>> fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse\n" ">>> complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this:\n" ">>>\n" @@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ "re,\n" wh -23fe9e1a396211f3fb3b6dbf5074268abac483d2daba3da6eb466dc4821069b4 +2dccaf4f262773868c6d90e95e10153479b20dca40e6a1bd46228e2e4185d029
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.