All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
To: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: nfsv4 + readdir == too many requests
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:39:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3462A8.2070406@desy.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2F6B3D.7080007@desy.de>

Still didn't got a time to test with vanilla kernel. But got some details.
It's works as expected with sec=sys. With sec=krb5 I see this effect.
Unfortunately kernel crashes as soon as I try to re-run tests. It simply
freezes with no stack traces....

Regards,
    Tigran

On 01/13/2011 10:14 PM, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 10:01 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 21:26 +0100, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
>>
>>> By running intensive tests I notice that readdir oration over nfsv4.1
>>> asks for
>>> file attributes in readdir (attr_request) and later on for each file. To
>>> me it looks like
>>> broken.
>>>
>>> This 2.6.37 + pnfs-all-latests :
>>>
>>> git://linux-nfs.org/~bhalevy/linux-pnfs.git
>>> 378978453b64bf895de8cd0e68dbcd9e9c0155ce
>>>
>>> 100% reproducible.
>>>
>> 1) What makes you think this is broken, and not just a case of the
>> attribute cache timing out and/or the directory changing?
>>
> The directory does not changed. I issue 'ls -l' and with wireshak can
> see READDIR requests
> followed by GETATTR. looks like cache is ignored or too small.
>> 2) Can you produce a testcase that proves brokenness?
>>
> I will try to come up with something.
>> 3) Can you reproduce on a non-pnfs-all-latests kernel?
>>
>> Readdir shouldn't be affected by the stuff in Benny's tree, but I'm
>> always wary of tests on out-of-mainline trees.
>>
> NP. with vanilla 2.6.37 ?
>
> Regards,
>     Tigran.
>> Cheers
>>     Trond
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


      reply	other threads:[~2011-01-17 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-13 20:26 nfsv4 + readdir == too many requests Tigran Mkrtchyan
2011-01-13 21:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-01-13 21:14   ` Tigran Mkrtchyan
2011-01-17 15:39     ` Tigran Mkrtchyan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D3462A8.2070406@desy.de \
    --to=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.