From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anish Patel Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:26:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Sandy Bridge support? Message-Id: <4D34C21C.3040206@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <0022152d6d71d9f528049a109a02@google.com> In-Reply-To: <0022152d6d71d9f528049a109a02@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On 01/17/11 16:54, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:26 -0500, DarkNovaNick@gmail.com wrote: >> I recently bought the new Intel Sandy Bridge processor, i5-2500k, >> along with a Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H motherboard. I've used lm_sensors >> in the past and am trying to get it to work with my new setup (on >> Ubuntu 10.10 kernel 2.6.35-24). I downloaded the latest version of the >> sensors-detect script from the website and it was not able to find any >> sensors. Here is the output: >> >> --------- >> >> # sensors-detect revision 5901 (2011-01-14 17:11:54 +0100) >> # System: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H67A-UD3H >> >> This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need >> to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe >> and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions, >> unless you know what you're doing. >> >> Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded >> sensors. >> Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): >> Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No >> VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No >> VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No >> AMD K8 thermal sensors... No >> AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No >> AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No >> Intel Core family thermal sensor... No >> Intel Atom thermal sensor... No >> Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No >> VIA C7 thermal sensor... No >> VIA Nano thermal sensor... No >> >> Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to >> standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe. >> Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): >> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f >> Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No >> Trying family `SMSC'... No >> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No >> Trying family `ITE'... Yes >> Found unknown chip with ID 0x8728 >> (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors) > The problem is more likely that the SuperIO chip used in your system is > not supported. If so, your problem doesn't have anything to do with > SandyBridge. > > Guenter > > > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors > i think the more likely problem is that his kernel doesn't know about the sandy bridge thermal diode. the coretemp module probably needs an update. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors