From: domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
Subject: [refpolicy] optional_policy blocks
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:05:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D35BA30.6020002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295366016.3083.14.camel@tesla.lan>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2011 04:53 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> Hello Dominick !
>
> Thanks very much for your reply.
>
> On Tue, 18/01/2011 at 15.58 +0100, Dominick Grift wrote:
>> On 01/18/2011 03:39 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
>>> Hello !
>>>
>>> I am trying to build and test a modified version of the git reference
>>> policy. It is being built of type MCS and not monolithic.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it seems that for some reason all of the
>>> "optional_policy" blocks that are often used in TE files are not being
>>> compiled in.
>>
>> Because optional policy does not apply to monolithic policy. All modules
>> are in a single module (the base module), thus all dependencies are
>> installed.
>
> I am not building a monolithic policy (please see my original message
> above).
Whoops misread that part, sorry.
> In any case, even if I was building a monolithic policy then I should
> have the optional blocks compiled in for those "modules" that have been
> compiled in the base.
Sounds strange indeed. Are you sure it is not including any of the
policy in optional policy block or just some?
If it is just incidental then it could be an error in the interface in
the optional policy block.
If this really applies to all optional policy then i guess something
else is going on.
> What do you say ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Guido
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk01ujAACgkQMlxVo39jgT9sAgCglDJgFAq97b3V1BvZxBHa1oCU
WiEAoIOTryxPqZbJEgJ9Sm65cFC6w3Ko
=yS5d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-18 14:39 [refpolicy] optional_policy blocks Guido Trentalancia
2011-01-18 14:58 ` Dominick Grift
2011-01-18 15:53 ` Guido Trentalancia
2011-01-18 16:05 ` Dominick Grift [this message]
2011-01-18 20:56 ` Guido Trentalancia
2011-01-18 23:51 ` Chris PeBenito
2011-01-18 16:16 ` Guido Trentalancia
2011-01-18 16:27 ` Dominick Grift
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D35BA30.6020002@gmail.com \
--to=domg472@gmail.com \
--cc=refpolicy@oss.tresys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.