From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45881 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfEmL-0008VJ-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:52:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfElf-0000RG-I0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:51:33 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:64631) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfElf-0000R3-FO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:50:51 -0500 Received: by qwk4 with SMTP id 4so6183261qwk.4 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:50:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D35C4E7.4080704@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:50:47 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] strtosz(): Use suffix macros in switch() statement References: <1295284345-24524-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <1295284345-24524-3-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, Alex.Williamson@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/18/2011 03:20 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com writes: > > >> From: Jes Sorensen >> >> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen >> --- >> cutils.c | 10 +++++----- >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/cutils.c b/cutils.c >> index 328738c..f2c8bbd 100644 >> --- a/cutils.c >> +++ b/cutils.c >> @@ -324,26 +324,26 @@ ssize_t strtosz_suffix(const char *nptr, char **end, const char default_suffix) >> } >> } >> switch (toupper(d)) { >> - case 'B': >> + case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_B: >> mul = 1; >> if (mul_required) { >> goto fail; >> } >> break; >> - case 'K': >> + case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_KB: >> mul = 1<< 10; >> break; >> case 0: >> if (mul_required) { >> goto fail; >> } >> - case 'M': >> + case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_MB: >> mul = 1ULL<< 20; >> break; >> - case 'G': >> + case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_GB: >> mul = 1ULL<< 30; >> break; >> - case 'T': >> + case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_TB: >> mul = 1ULL<< 40; >> break; >> default: >> > And this improves what? Certainly not clarity. > > In my opinion, the STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_TB are useless chaff. Chacun à son > goût. > Yeah, I have to agree. I'm not of the literals are evil camp. BTW, a useful change would be to accept both upper and lower case letters. Regards, Anthony Liguori