From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anish Patel Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:25:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] patch to sensor-detect script to support SMSC Message-Id: <4D361353.5040801@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <4D346ACA.8050601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D346ACA.8050601@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On 01/18/11 17:15, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:02:46PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote: > [ ... ] >>>>> Chip Register 0xed >>>>> emc1043 0x0c .. 0x0f, 0x2c >>>>> emc1053 0x3c .. 0x3f >>>>> emc1063 0x30 .. 0x33 >>>>> >>>>> So I wonder if you might really have emc1043 on your board instead of >>>>> emc1023. Would that be possible ? >>>> its possible, but i just found a spare CPU carrier card and looked at >>>> it. the IC is def a 1023. >>>> I guess it is possible that i have fake/rebadged 1023. >>> Interesting. Should be easy to find out, though. emc1043 has register >>> 0x04 with a default value of 0x09. That register does not exist on >>> emc1023 and should either return the previously read value or an error. >>> emc1043 also has registers 0x29 and 0x2a which don't exist on the >>> emc1023. Maybe you can use i2cdump to see what registers the chip >>> supports, and send the result to the list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Guenter >>> >>> >>> >> here is the i2cdump for both ic's >> >> its pretty strange, i have the dump of what seems to be a 1043, but the part is labeled 1023 >> link to imgshack -> http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1006/20110118165728.jpg >> > Thought so. On the plus side, we can get support for four chips, not just one... > > Guenter > i just sent of a req to the board vendor for the MNF PN and datasheet for that part, hopefully i get it tonight _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors