From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Ceph on just two nodes being clients - reasonable? Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:33:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4D36BDF9.4030404@wpkg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.virtall.com ([178.63.195.102]:41635 "EHLO mail.virtall.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984Ab1ASKn4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:43:56 -0500 Received: from mail.virtall.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.virtall.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD63A35CAFB for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:33:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.145] (e183095092.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.183.95.92]) by mail.virtall.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A278335CAF8 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:33:31 +0100 (CET) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Is it reasonable to set up Ceph on two nodes, which are Ceph clients at the same time? Say, we have two machines: ceph1 -- ceph2 On each of them, Ceph filesystem is mounted in /shared, which is used by services like a webserver or a mailserver. Is it a reasonable approach? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org