From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfemp-0007pF-MD for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:37:47 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1PfemB-00053X-6c from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:37:07 -0800 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:37:06 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.47] ([172.30.80.47]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:37:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4D374B50.3090402@mentor.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:36:32 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1295286639-4901-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <4D34952B.607@mentor.com> <201101180730.29536.roman@khimov.ru> <4D3661AC.8030708@mentor.com> <20110119042954.GA30752@gmail.com> <4D37215D.7050209@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2011 20:37:05.0952 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2C1B200:01CBB818] Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] minimal.conf: Prefer perl 5.10.1 and opie 1.2.5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:37:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/19/2011 10:57 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 01/18/2011 09:29 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On (18/01/11 20:59), Tom Rini wrote: >>>> >>>> On 01/17/2011 09:30 PM, Roman I Khimov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> В сообщении от Понедельник 17 января 2011 22:14:51 автор Tom Rini >>>>> написал: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 01/17/2011 10:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>> I see different problems with perl 5.10.1 + uclibc + p2020ds, so I >>>>>> guess >>>>>> this is fine with me. >>>>> >>>>> What kind of problems? >>>> >>>> Khem fixed it tonight. At heart, there's been a need to make much >>>> better use of the libc-uclibc override rather than testing TARGET_OS >>>> as there's at least 'linux-uclibc', 'linux-uclibceabi' and >>>> 'linux-uclibcspe' as valid TARGET_OS combinations. >>> >>> I thought about it and indeed it would be better to have a LIBC override >>> but its defined in .inc files which may not be included by all >>> distributions, if this makes into bitbake.conf somehow then that would >>> be better or we can decide to have a global data var called LIBC or some >>> sort. >> >> We already did this. A distro that doesn't pull in the right libc inc file >> is either broken or on its own (I forget and can't check atm if Angstrom >> uses the files eventually or just also has the libc-foo OVERRIDES, but is >> correct here). > > yes angstrom does. Ok I moved slugos to use it recently so its no more broken :) Um, when did SlugOS break then? When I introduced the libc overrides I moved everyone over to it. > We also have LIBC as a global env way to say what LIBC to >> use (Angstrom has ANGSTROMLIBC and LIBC since they originated the feature). > > nice we can use LIBC as well if need be but override is more elegant Yes, LIBC shouldn't be parsed like that, it's like MACHINE :) -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation