From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cory Coager Subject: Re: support for physical ramdisk Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:14:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4D378C5E.7050309@gmail.com> References: <4D377D66.5020609@gmail.com> <4D37890B.3060808@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org I would think even a low end DDR2 module would saturate the SATA interface bandwidth. How would external journal to bcache help? On 01/19/2011 08:03 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Ahh, that makes sense. I'd be curious what performance you get - it > certainly wasn't designed with ram in mind. You'll want to play around > with the bucket size and see what works best, too. > > Also, in the future I'm going to add support for an external journal > to bcache - that could be the best of both worlds, for you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html