From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC3E4C80BD4 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:35:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2011 09:35:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,352,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="698852058" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.114]) ([10.255.14.114]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2011 09:35:23 -0800 Message-ID: <4D38725A.9050300@intel.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:35:22 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilya Yanok References: <1295296178-18590-1-git-send-email-aalonso@secretlab.ca> <1295296178-18590-3-git-send-email-aalonso@secretlab.ca> <4D3799C1.7000108@emcraft.com> In-Reply-To: <4D3799C1.7000108@emcraft.com> Cc: poky@pokylinux.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] gcc: crosssdk unset TARGET_FPU X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:35:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/19/2011 06:11 PM, Ilya Yanok wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > I'm sorry, I was wrong in my previous postings. > I was confused by the gcc-crosssdk recipe name. > Now I think your solution is perfectly legal, but I still think that > comment is misleading: > it's not powerpc arch that does not sipport --with-float=soft, it's > x86_64 (in my case)! > > I think we should just reset TARGET_FPU from crosssdk.bbclass, what do > you think about it? > Adrian, Will you please re-publish the patch based on Ilya's feedback or let me know if you want to go with your orignal patch. Thanks Sau! > Regards, Ilya. > > On 18.01.2011 03:59, Adrian Alonso wrote: >> Hi Ilya, >> >> I will also look for the proper solution, >> However un-setting TARGET_FPU only affects the target machines >> in meta-xilinx layer bsp, so other Powerpc targets are not been affected >> with this patch. >> >> Regards >> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ilya Yanok > > wrote: >> >> Hi Adrian, >> >> Adrian Alonso writes: >> >> > >> > * Configure fails due that --with-float=soft >> > flag isn't supportted by powerpc arch >> >> That's not true. PowerPC support soft-float (and we actually need >> this for >> MPC8308 which has e300c3 core without FPU). >> >> For me, configure fails with the same message but that's not >> because PowerPC >> lacks support for soft-float but cause gcc-crosssdk recipe passes >> wrong >> --target= option to the configure script (for me it's >> x86_86-pokysdk-linux, I'm >> building on the x86_64 host). >> >> > * Unsetting TARGET_FPU this flag to not try to use >> > this flag >> >> So please do NOT unset TARGET_FPU, some targets really need it. >> I'm looking >> forward to see a correct solution for this issue. >> >> Regards, Ilya. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> poky mailing list >> poky@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Saludos >> Adrian Alonso >> http://aalonso.wordpress.com >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > poky mailing list > poky@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky