From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Should we remove all the virtual wiphy code from ath9k?
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:27:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D387E75.8000006@candelatech.com> (raw)
Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being
removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it?
It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to
work much better), and it would likely simplify the code
a bit to have it gone.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 18:27 Ben Greear [this message]
2011-01-20 18:42 ` [ath9k-devel] Should we remove all the virtual wiphy code from ath9k? Jouni Malinen
2011-01-20 18:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D387E75.8000006@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.