From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:04:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D38CD9F.1040905@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295563629-14996-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
> "conntrack -L" shows us this two entries:
> tcp 6 431999 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.1.1 dst=192.168.1.2 sport=51444 \
> dport=22 src=192.168.1.2 dst=192.168.1.1 sport=22 dport=51444 [ASSURED] \
> mark=0 established=1 related=0 new=3 reply=2 use=1
>
> icmp 1 28 src=192.168.1.2 dst=149.20.20.133 type=8 code=0 id=63239 \
> src=149.20.20.133 dst=192.168.1.2 type=0 code=0 id=63239 mark=0 \
> established=2 related=0 new=2 reply=1 use=1
>
Isn't there supposed to be secctx (SELinux context) field showing as
well or is this still not implemented in the conntrack tools?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 22:47 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: add ruleid extension Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: add APPROVE target Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: implement ctnetlink_dump_ruleid() Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH] iptables: Add APPROVE target Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH] conntrack: Implement ruleid support Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: add APPROVE target Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-20 23:22 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 23:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-20 23:30 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:52 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-20 23:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 11:13 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 11:26 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 11:56 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 12:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 12:53 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 13:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 13:38 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 13:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 14:11 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 15:09 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-01-21 0:04 ` Mr Dash Four [this message]
2011-01-21 0:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 0:13 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-01-21 9:58 ` secctx support for conntrack-tools [was Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules] Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 9:56 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D38CD9F.1040905@googlemail.com \
--to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.