From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dd20204.kasserver.com ([85.13.140.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PgF4v-0002jv-PD for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:22:53 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.135] (188-195-80-208-dynip.superkabel.de [188.195.80.208]) by dd20204.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B792180445E4 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:22:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D396C5B.4050800@opensimpad.org> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:22:03 +0100 From: Bernhard Guillon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4D36F9BE.1010601@xora.org.uk> <4D373EDB.1070200@balister.org> In-Reply-To: <4D373EDB.1070200@balister.org> Subject: Re: openembedded-core git repository X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:22:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19.01.2011 20:43, Philip Balister wrote: > > We should also have some discussion on the process for getting stuff=20 > into -core and how devs get commit access. Basically, we need to think = > about how to integrate the OpenEmbedded people and the Yocto people. > First of all I am not against a pull based model. But in my opinion we=20 should start a poll to decide the commit model for core. Afterwards if=20 we agree that a pull based model is well suited for core we should do=20 another poll to decide who will be the "king". We should also have some=20 rules for how to change the king. Also the king should only rule for a=20 limited time. After this time period there should be another poll. In my = opinion this will help people to accept what the king decides. We also=20 need rules for rejects of pull requests. They should have a technical=20 reason. The king should also be responsible for security issues. If I=20 got it right yocto has full-time developers so one should do full-time=20 security stuff for core. I know we have the TSC but a poll does not hurt. I belief that most=20 developers will agree with the pull based model. best regards Bernhard