From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: Re: [libvirt] [RFC] libxenlight driver Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:02:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4D39BC0F.8030603@novell.com> References: <4D38CA05.2070601@novell.com> <20110121111343.GE11539@redhat.com> <4D39AABA.8090101@novell.com> <1295627635.12018.373.camel@qabil.uk.xensource.com> <20110121164443.GJ12589@redhat.com> <1295629077.14780.403.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1295629077.14780.403.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: LibVir , xen-devel , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Gianni Tedesco List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:44 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> On a related note, where does XenAPI fit into this picture ? >> Previously XenD would provide (at least some of) the XenAPI >> functionality in the open source stack, while I understand >> that the XenEnterprise had a separate impl of XenAPI. It >> sounds like XenAPI is likely only relevant for XenEnterprise >> connectivity in the future. >> > > The xapi toolstack which implements XenAPI is now open source as well > and is used in XCP (as well as XenServer). > But there is no intent on putting this toolstack in the traditional Xen releases from xen.org correct? Jim