From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: "Oleg V. Ukhno" <olegu@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: added 802.3ad round-robin hashing policy for single TCP session balancing
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:48:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3AD234.7080709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D399062.3060004@yandex-team.ru>
Le 21/01/2011 14:55, Oleg V. Ukhno a écrit :
> On 01/19/2011 11:12 PM, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote:
>
>> If you have time for that, then yes, please, do the same test using
>> balance-rr+vlan to segregate path. With those results, we whould have
>> the opportunity to enhance the documentation with some well tested cases
>> of TCP load balancing on a LAN, not limited to 802.3ad automatic setup.
>> Both setups make sense, and assuming the results would be similar is
>> probably true, but not reliable enough to assert it into the
>> documentation.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nicolas.
>>
> Nicolas,
> I've ran similar tests for VLAN tunneling scenario. Results are
> identical, as I expected. The only significat difference is link failure
> handling. 802.3ad mode allows almost painless load reditribution,
> balance-rr causes packet loss.
Oleg,
Thanks for doing the tests.
What link failure mode did you use for those tests ? miimon or arp monitoring ?
Nicolas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-22 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-14 19:07 [PATCH] bonding: added 802.3ad round-robin hashing policy for single TCP session balancing Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:10 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-14 23:12 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:13 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-14 22:51 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-15 0:05 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-15 12:11 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 3:16 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-18 12:40 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 14:54 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-18 15:28 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 16:24 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-18 16:57 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 20:24 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-18 21:20 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-19 1:45 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-18 22:22 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-19 16:13 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-19 20:12 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-21 13:55 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-22 12:48 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-01-24 19:32 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-29 2:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-01 16:25 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-02-02 17:30 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-02 9:54 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-02 17:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-03 14:54 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 17:56 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-01-18 16:41 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-18 17:21 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:41 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D3AD234.7080709@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olegu@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.