Re: [PATCH] angstrom-2010.x.conf: Prefer binutils 2.21 and uclibc-git

[Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>]

On 01/24/2011 08:15 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 01:59 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> 2011/1/24 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>> Pushing distro changes without review is against the policy:
>>
>>> From http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy:
>>
>> * Distro config changes should be reviewed by the distro maintainers
>> where known
>>
>> Reveting changes from others is also against the policy:
>>
>> http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Revert_Policy
>>
>> (and imho equally bad (or insulting if you prefer))
>>
>>
>> Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
>>
>> My two eurocents. Frans.
>
> Frans, as noted this change intoduces serious issues with some Angstrom
> targets. The Angstrom devs know what is best for Angstrom. I'm not sure
> what Khem was thinking by pushing this change without consulting with
> Angstrom devs.

Not to put too many words into Khem's mouth, but I imagine it was that 
he checked this in on the same branch as the other changes he pushed 
last night and forgot (time for some 'git stash'ing Khem :))

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation