From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhPSP-00069Q-8K for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:40:03 +0100 Received: (qmail 6915 invoked by uid 1003); 24 Jan 2011 16:39:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.104?) (philip@opensdr.com@207.47.37.2) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 16:39:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4D3DAB2A.3070303@balister.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:39:06 -0800 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4D36F9BE.1010601@xora.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4D36F9BE.1010601@xora.org.uk> Subject: Re: openembedded-core git repository X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:40:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/19/2011 06:48 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: > Hi, this email is sent as an ordinary member of OE. > > It seems to be on a technical level we are agreed that we should split > parts of OE out into the so called openembedded-core which will have a > stricter commit access and higher QA requirements on changes. > > I therefore think it is time to actually create the repository and let > the people who are interested in merging the good stuff from poky with > the good stuff from openembedded to create our "core". I don't think > there is any need to wait on the political part of the Yocto/OE > collaboration as its something we have agreed in principal to do anyway. > > I would request then that the TSC drive this forward with the server > admins and create this repo so work can happen. Has anything happened on this email? Has the TSC had a meeting to discuss? I know it has only been a week, but people are starting to do work based on these ideas and need some support from the TSC. Philip