From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0? Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:45:14 -0800 Message-ID: <4D3E2B2A.7020708@goop.org> References: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F2231C1349A@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F2231C1349A@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/24/2011 05:33 PM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Hi jeremy > Now we use xen/stable-2.6.32.x for testing. But I found the xen/stable-2.6.33.x is ready? Should we move to it? > There is no xen/stable-2.6.33; there might have been at one point, but it was never more than a placeholder. What kind of work are you doing? Mainline Linux contains a lot of dom0 support now, but not quite enough to usefully run a domain. We're in the middle of preparing a 2.6.38-rc based branch which will be more complete. xen/stable-2.6.32.x is still the most feature-complete branch, but it is more or less in a maintenance state, and will probably only get bugfix updates. J