From: "Maik Hänig" <maik.haenig@s2000.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Uboot can't start kernel after change from version 2009.01 to 2010.09
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3EB771.4000008@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3EB35D.4090905@gmail.com>
Dear Andreas Bie?mann,
> please do not hijack a thread!
sorry I didn't want do this. I wanted to give some more information.
> Ok, you use 2010.09. This was last release before relocate changes.
> Therefore it has no connection with the relocation stuff.
yes I. I tried to make a patch for 2010.12 but the uboot don't starts so
I tried in the first step the version before. It is a similar board to
the at91rm9200dk. It hangs in the low level_init file. But I have only a
keil jtag debugger and couldn't debug it. or is there any possibility to
use it with the gdb?
I found the problem in the board.c of the arm architecture. But can't
see why. Line 303 is reached but line 312 not. Also line 306 is not
reached. I don't know why, maybe you can give me a hint?
I think if the problem is found the problem with the at91rm9200dk is
also found.
>> Is it nessesary to set a
>> console parameter in the bootcmd in uboot version 2010.09?
>
> We don't know your configuration. What tells your working setup in
> kernel log messages about 'Command line'? -> /proc/cmdline
I only give the MAC and the running image in the cmdline. I think the
problem must be in the uboot.
>
> What is your board exactly? Is it currently in official u-boot or do you
> have another tree?
> at91rm9200dk is most likely broken with current u-boot (2010.12) and
> will be removed for 2011.03. So if you have a at91rm9200dk at hand
> please try to get the current u-boot working with that board and provide
> patches. You may see my patches for at91rm9200ek which at least make
> at91rm9200ek boot from SDRAM when setup correctly with an jtag (->
> booting with at91bootstrab should also work but is untested).
It isn't in official u-boot tree. You can have a look in the patch.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gr??en
Maik H?nig
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: u-boot-2010.12.patch
Url: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110125/3b524908/attachment.asc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 8:53 [U-Boot] Default base for numbers Alexander Holler
2011-01-25 9:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-25 9:38 ` Alexander Holler
2011-01-25 10:13 ` [U-Boot] Uboot can't start kernel after change from version 2009.01 to 2010.09 Maik Hänig
2011-01-25 10:54 ` Reinhard Meyer
2011-01-25 11:03 ` Maik Hänig
2011-01-25 11:18 ` Maik Hänig
2011-01-25 11:29 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-01-25 11:36 ` Maik Hänig
2011-01-25 13:04 ` Maik Hänig
2011-01-25 11:26 ` Andreas Bießmann
2011-01-25 11:43 ` Maik Hänig [this message]
2011-01-25 10:19 ` Maik Hänig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D3EB771.4000008@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de \
--to=maik.haenig@s2000.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.