From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@redhat.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:28:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3EDE07.1080200@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125052902.GC7850@core.coreip.homeip.net>
On 11-01-25 12:29 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:04:10AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> On 11-01-24 11:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
>>> The options are:
>>>
>>> 1. Convert to EVIOCGKEYCODE2
>>> 2. Ignore errors from EVIOCGKEYCODE and go through all 65536 iterations.
>>
>> or 3. Revert/fix the in-kernel regression.
>>
>> The EVIOCGKEYCODE ioctl is supposed to return KEY_RESERVED for unmapped
>> (but value) keycodes, and only return -EINVAL when the keycode itself
>> is out of range.
>
> You are inventing rules. You are requesting a scancode->keycode
> mapping. If scancode is unknown/invalid for the device ioctl returns
> -EINVAL.
-EINVAL signals bad/invalid parameters.
That's NOT what is happening here.
> For unmapped - yes, either KEY_RESERVED or KEY_UNKNOWN should be
> returned. For invalid scancodes -EINVAL shoudl be returned.
Exactly my point. The scancode in question is 100% valid and mapable,
yet the kernel is rejecting it as -EINVAL. Incorrect.
BUG. Regression. Breaks userspace. Must get fixed.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-23 17:03 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? Mark Lord
2011-01-24 17:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 0:32 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 0:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 4:13 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 4:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 4:37 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 4:43 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 4:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 5:04 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 5:07 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 5:15 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 5:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 6:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 14:42 ` Extending rc-core/userspace to handle bigger scancodes - Was: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 16:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 9:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 11:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 14:32 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 16:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 20:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 21:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 22:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 23:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 2:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 11:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 13:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 14:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 14:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 16:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 16:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 18:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 20:09 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 20:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:27 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 14:58 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 17:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 17:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:30 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 15:05 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 16:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:31 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:33 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:47 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 21:41 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 21:49 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 22:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 22:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 1:01 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 1:07 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 2:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 3:18 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 6:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 10:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-27 15:00 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 17:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 9:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 11:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 16:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 17:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 17:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 18:34 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:53 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 14:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 16:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:12 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 16:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:55 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:03 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 5:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 14:28 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2011-02-02 14:31 ` Chase Douglas
2011-02-02 16:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-02 20:00 ` Chase Douglas
2011-02-02 21:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-02-02 22:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D3EDE07.1080200@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.