From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203CA4C811A5 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:31:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2011 13:31:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,382,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="651494461" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.182]) ([10.255.14.182]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2011 13:31:00 -0800 Message-ID: <4D409288.90903@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:30:48 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Lorenzati, Marcelo" References: In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: ulibc instead of glibc X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:31:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/25/2011 10:36 AM, Lorenzati, Marcelo wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to know if it’s feasible to build Yocto with ulibc instead of > glibc and if someone have tried. > > In a really constrained system could be the difference between selecting > RT Linux or another real time OS. What size of an image are you hoping to achieve? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel