From: Andras Domokos <andras.domokos@nokia.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] voicecallmanager-api: call related SS signals (proposal)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:54:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D41951B.4000808@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296133657.1520.145.camel@aeonflux>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2621 bytes --]
Hi Marcel,
On 01/27/2011 03:07 PM, ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Andras,
>
>> Here is a proposal for expanding VoiceCallManager's DBus interface with
>> call related Supplementary Services signals.
>> The implementation would be based on the functionality provided by the SSN
>> atom (handling the CSSU codes).
>>
>> ---
>> doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt b/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt
>> index 2bf9ded..5212eac 100644
>> --- a/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt
>> +++ b/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt
>> @@ -123,7 +123,59 @@ Methods dict GetProperties()
>> '*', '#', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D'. The last four are
>> typically not used in normal circumstances.
>>
>> -Signals CallAdded(object path, dict properties)
>> +Signals CallForwarded(object path)
>> +
>> + Signal sent during call setup when the incoming call is
>> + a forwarded call. The signal contains the object path of
>> + the call in cause.
> I don't like this even a single bit. We changed the voice call API
> exactly this way to avoid any potential race conditions between calls
> and their properties. So please leave this as CallAdded() with the
> object path and its properties.
>
> Also having to watch more than three signals for call handling is a bit
> overboard. This will cause a lot of extra traffic during setup towards
> the D-Bus daemon. Pretty much a bad idea.
I agree, it seems better to have the various call related Supplementary
Services indications coming from the network be treated as voice call
properties.
The informations carried in SS indications coming from the network
during an MT call setup can be easily bound to the right call instance
(is the call being instantiated) and have them show up in the CallAdded
signal as properties. But then there are the indications sent during a
voice call, like when a call is put on hold or retrieved from held state by
the remote party, cases in which there is no information about what is
the targeted call instance, the SSN notifications are not providing this
info.
This becomes a problem when there are multiple calls since it is not
possible to determine to which call instance the indication is referring to.
This raises the question where/how to show this type of properties?
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ofono mailing list
> ofono(a)ofono.org
> http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
Regards,
Andras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1296122953.git.Andras.Domokos@nokia.com>
2011-01-27 10:20 ` [RFC] voicecallmanager-api: call related SS signals (proposal) Andras Domokos
2011-01-27 10:39 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-01-27 13:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-01-27 15:54 ` Andras Domokos [this message]
2011-01-27 16:01 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-28 17:13 ` Andras Domokos
2011-01-28 18:19 ` Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D41951B.4000808@nokia.com \
--to=andras.domokos@nokia.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.