From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 622b520f changed -drive if=scsi, index=N, intentional?
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:27:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D426FEC.2080405@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D41C6CA.2000404@redhat.com>
On 01/27/2011 08:26 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> } else if (!strcmp(buf, "scsi")) {
>> type = IF_SCSI;
>> - max_devs = MAX_SCSI_DEVS;
>> + max_devs = 7;
>
>> That's very obviously not much more than a hack, but I don't think
>> blockdev.c can get the real number easily (please prove me wrong). With
>> this hack, we would get the old behaviour for -drive (which doesn't use
>> any other controller anyway) and you can still use -device to attach
>> more devices to a non-lsi bus.
>
> Looks sensible to me. scsi controllers with more than 7 devs (megasas
> and whatever else might be coming, virtio?) can't be added via if=scsi
> legacy syntax and must use -blockdev and -device anyway.
>
> We probably want add a comment explaining this though.
>
Yes please. It's a bit non-obvious that 'scsi' means in fact 'lsi'.
As long as there a way of specifying more than 8 devs
I'm fine with that patch.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 12:10 [Qemu-devel] Commit 622b520f changed -drive if=scsi, index=N, intentional? Markus Armbruster
2011-01-27 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2011-01-27 15:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-27 19:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-28 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2011-01-27 12:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-27 12:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D426FEC.2080405@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.