From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> []
>> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many
>> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than
>> ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect
>> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on.
>> Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having
>> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and
>> optimization.
>
> It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new
> functionality into a "stable" branch. Having nothing bad
> against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new
> functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released
> before new year... ;)
>
> I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can
> be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape
> and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges.
To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have
no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are
Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on
the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be
destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm
inclined to say no as well.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be
applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 8:29 [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-27 10:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0.14] spice + usb Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-27 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? Markus Armbruster
2011-01-27 12:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-01-27 15:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-27 16:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-27 16:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] fix crash when a read handler calls qemu_set_fd_handler2() Rick Vernam
2011-01-27 17:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-27 19:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-01-28 0:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-27 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] seabios virtio bug Rick Vernam
2011-01-27 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-27 17:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-01-28 7:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? Gleb Natapov
2011-01-27 18:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-28 8:06 ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-01-28 10:00 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-01-28 13:33 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-01-28 14:21 ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-02-02 9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-03 4:44 ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-01-28 16:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-29 13:43 ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-01-28 6:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2011-02-02 19:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] Missing patches (mostly fixes) Stefan Weil
2011-02-02 21:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-03 7:00 ` Riku Voipio
2011-02-03 10:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2011-02-04 12:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 12:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-04 14:40 ` Alexander Graf
2011-02-04 15:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-02-04 15:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 16:42 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-02-04 17:18 ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-04 17:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 17:36 ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-04 17:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 18:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-02-07 19:18 ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-16 20:26 ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-16 20:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-02-04 15:45 ` malc
2011-02-05 19:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-05 19:34 ` riku voipio
2011-02-23 21:50 ` Stefan Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.