From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Anderson Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:22:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] W83795AG on SuperMicro 7046T-NTR+ board Message-Id: <4D46FDF5.6020008@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <4D44621B.40506@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <4D44621B.40506@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On 01/31/2011 12:07 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:13:24 -0800, David Anderson wrote: >> Here is a configure file that worked (to go with the new >> kernel module). It may not be perfect. inserted it as >> /etc/sensors.d/w83795ag.conf >> >> chip "w83795-*" > This can't work, as the chip will be named w83795adg-* or w83795g-* by > libsensors. It is in fact a w83795adg as reported by dmesg. The supermicro folks had a typo in what they sent me, as you suggested earlier. They also sent +12V Voltage, Offset 0x14 Voltage = Data* 0.008/ (10./66.2) which I had as compute in4 @*(10.0/66.2), @/(10.0/66.2) Aha. Notice I misread what they sent me. They used '/ /' and I used '* /'. My reading of the algebra was careless. So I switched to Henrique's equation which is an accurate representation: compute in4 @*6.62, @/6.62 which gives a more sensible output (11.94 volts). Thanks again for all the help. David Anderson _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors