From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:25:34 -0800
Message-ID: <4D46FE9E.3010502@goop.org>
References: <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110131170506.GA11939@dumpdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:48854 "EHLO claw.goop.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754573Ab1AaSZi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:25:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110131170506.GA11939@dumpdata.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On 01/31/2011 09:05 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:41:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20110121:
>>
>> New tree: unicore32
>>
>> Renamed tree: swiotlb-xen to xen-two
> Sweet. Thank you.
>> Dropped tree: xen
> Uh, why? Jeremy's tree should be OK now? Did something not
> compile correctly? 

No, keep it dropped for now.  I'll do a proper linux-next branch shortly.

    J