From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkAkB-000884-1F for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:33:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 21438 invoked by uid 503); 1 Feb 2011 08:13:39 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail607.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 63.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 08:13:38 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 09:32:50 +0200 Received: from tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.2.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.233.81.124) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 09:32:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4D47B720.90008@eukrea.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:32:48 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1296220046-14636-1-git-send-email-sujak.marek@gmail.com> <20110129140758.GM2466@ibawizard.net> <20110131212130.GB10042@ibawizard.net> In-Reply-To: X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13195828385133276489 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.233.81.124 (tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] barebox: added recipe for barebox v 2010.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:33:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 01/02/2011 07:38, Marek Sujak wrote: >> Yes i did that, i forgot to merge machine support patches. And after first > commit it was to late for me to fix it. > At least "[Patch v3] barebox: added recipe for barebox v 2010.10" should be > ok. > Just machine support are divided to (1=patches + 2=recipe update) > [PATCH v3] barebox: patches for barebox 2010.10 to support vmx25 > [PATCH v3] barebox: update barebox 2010.10 to support vmx25 > > It is partially acceptable or should i rework it again? > I pushed your patches yesterday : http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded/log/ Eric