From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Soubir Acharya Subject: Re: XCP PV driver Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:55:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4D481EF9.6030209@kubisys.com> References: <4D44C47D.6050802@kubisys.com> <291EDFCB1E9E224A99088639C47620228CFFAD7900@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <4D481BCE.8080806@kubisys.com> <291EDFCB1E9E224A99088639C47620228CFFAD7923@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <291EDFCB1E9E224A99088639C47620228CFFAD7923@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Paul Durrant Cc: James Harper , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2/1/2011 9:49 AM, Paul Durrant wrote: > I guess that succeeding the ops may affect the slew of WHQL tests that the storage driver is expected to pass. > It'd be kind of nice to make it work 'properly' such that a disk image passed into multiple VMS could be shared via MSCS, and we could still pass WHQL. I'll stick it on the bottom of my 'have a look at this' list. Good point. One option would be to return failure as default (so that we are OK with WHQL), and then turn the feature on via a registry setting or similar? I can also research the WHQL requirement for disk arbitration. Soubir