From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A432A4C800A7 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:28:00 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 3046F166029B; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:28:00 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89865166028C; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:27:59 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4D49A22F.6030003@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:27:59 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <4D499346.4050800@mlbassoc.com> <4D49976E.5030800@linux.intel.com> <1296669636.1544.4238.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1296669636.1544.4238.camel@rex> Cc: Poky Subject: Re: Poky & armv5te X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:28:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/02/2011 11:00 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 09:42 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 02/02/2011 09:24 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> I'd like to use Poky with my OMAP-L138 which is armv5te >>> Sadly today, this just isn't a go because of GCC issues. >>> I've tried all the combinations which are in the trees >>> (main& contrib) with no luck: >>> * 4.3.3 - fails to build GCC >>> * 4.5.1 - everything builds but kernel crashes >>> * 4.5.2 - fails to build GCC >>> >>> Am I totally out of luck? >> >> What are you running into? I've recently backported some changes in >> support of the Beagleboard (armv7-a) which were necessary to build with >> 4.5.1 and our 2.21 binutils. > > Those wouldn't affect armv5. What puzzles me is that qemuarm is > effectively an armv5 like system and those do build and boot in qemu. > > When you managed images above for 4.5.1 did you try using a known good > kernel with our userspace? I'm wondering if we can narrow it to a kernel > issue? Not sure I got that far, but I'll check it out. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------