From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: IO_PAGE_FAULT from SATA card during boot Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:49:35 -0600 Message-ID: <4D49FB9F.9040304@gmail.com> References: <20110129112456.GA13204@arachsys.com> <4D44433F.1040607@gmail.com> <20110130015442.GB13204@arachsys.com> <20110202135644.GG11670@arachsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:41383 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755432Ab1BCAtj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:49:39 -0500 Received: by iyj18 with SMTP id 18so559474iyj.19 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:49:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110202135644.GG11670@arachsys.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Webb Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 02/02/2011 07:56 AM, Chris Webb wrote: > Robert Hancock writes: > >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Chris Webb wrote: >>> 03:00.0 Class 0106: Device 1b4b:9123 (rev 11) (prog-if 01) >>> ? ? ? ?Subsystem: Device 18ab:9115 >>> ? ? ? ?Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 41 >>> ? ? ? ?I/O ports at d800 [size=8] >>> ? ? ? ?I/O ports at d400 [size=4] >>> ? ? ? ?I/O ports at e800 [size=8] >>> ? ? ? ?I/O ports at e400 [size=4] >>> ? ? ? ?I/O ports at e000 [size=16] >>> ? ? ? ?Memory at febef800 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K] >>> ? ? ? ?Expansion ROM at febf0000 [disabled] [size=64K] >>> ? ? ? ?Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3 >>> ? ? ? ?Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- >>> ? ? ? ?Capabilities: [70] Express Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00 >>> ? ? ? ?Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting >>> ? ? ? ?Kernel driver in use: ahci >> >> Hmm, so that 03:00.1 device doesn't seem to show up at all? I think >> that these Marvell 9123 cards have a PATA controller integrated as >> well, maybe that has something to do with the issue? > > Yes, strange isn't it? There are no other add-on cards in this system, for > what it's worth, and the SATA card is definitely failing, so it does look > like it might be implicated. I have four such boxes, all of which show > identical symptoms. Is it the same model of add-on card? This controller apparently has both a SATA and PATA controller on it. The PATA portion doesn't seem to be showing up in lspci, but obviously the BIOS saw some sign of it - and if the IOMMU reporting can be believed, it's trying to do a read request for some reason.. > > Is there anything I can do to debug this better?