From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvmloader: add "wakeup from S4 on RTC
	alarm"bit to ACPI FADT
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:28:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4D4C1B1D.7010203@redhat.com>
References: <C971D41B.169C0%keir@xen.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C971D41B.169C0%keir@xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 02/04/2011 04:04 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Does a non-fatal error actually matter to passing a Windows logo test?

No, it doesn't, though I expect the error to become fatal in future 
releases of the tests.

Paolo