From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Are there hard limits on ATH_TXBUF?
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:24:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4C6087.6080809@candelatech.com> (raw)
I wanted to see if I could increase throughput in multi-vif scenario
by increasing the ATH_MAX_QDEPTH (by increasing ATH_TXBUF).
Is this a pure software thing, or are there hardware limitations
I should be aware of?
/***********/
/* RX / TX */
/***********/
#define ATH_MAX_ANTENNA 3
#define ATH_RXBUF 512
#define ATH_TXBUF 512
#define ATH_TXBUF_RESERVE 5
#define ATH_MAX_QDEPTH (ATH_TXBUF / 4 - ATH_TXBUF_RESERVE)
#define ATH_TXMAXTRY 13
#define ATH_MGT_TXMAXTRY 4
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 20:24 Ben Greear [this message]
2011-02-04 20:59 ` [ath9k-devel] Are there hard limits on ATH_TXBUF? Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4C6087.6080809@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.