From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Plk5G-0007wC-0N for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:29:58 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Plk4H-00037A-QH from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 07:28:57 -0800 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:28:56 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.88] ([172.30.80.88]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:28:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4D4D6CB1.9050008@mentor.com> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:28:49 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2011 15:28:56.0741 (UTC) FILETIME=[6759BD50:01CBC549] Subject: Re: testing branch 2011-02-03 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:29:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/04/2011 06:08 AM, Cliff Brake wrote: > master has been merged to testing-next and is ready for clean builds. > > I realize I've been tardy in getting the testing-next going, so I'm > going to create a cron job now that does that weekly. > > Last week's testing results: > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tag/?id=tested_2011-01-28 > > For more information on OE testing, see: > > http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Testing Without be21179c5321bd0afb9221f020ac12ad75c86a3b all of mine (would have) failed so I wont be reporting results on the table this week but I am kicking things off on current top of tree. I expect: - angstrom-2008.1 + qt4* to fail (reported earlier this week) - qt4* + arm + minimal-uclibc to fail (one of those __cxa_atexit things, will report better) - qt4* + mips64 + minimal-uclibc to fail (don't have the log handy, will report). -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation