From: Coly Li <i@coly.li>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] mballoc: remove unncessary mb_find_buddy()
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:53:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4E2961.6020007@coly.li> (raw)
In __mb_check_buddy(), look at the bellowed code,
591 fstart = -1;
592 buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
593 for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
594 if (!mb_test_bit(i, buddy)) {
595 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(i >= e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free);
596 if (fstart == -1) {
597 fragments++;
598 fstart = i;
599 }
600 continue;
601 }
602 fstart = -1;
603 /* check used bits only */
604 for (j = 0; j < e4b->bd_blkbits + 1; j++) {
605 buddy2 = mb_find_buddy(e4b, j, &max2);
606 k = i >> j;
607 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(k < max2);
608 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(mb_test_bit(k, buddy2));
609 }
610 }
611 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(!EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(e4b->bd_info));
612 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments == fragments);
613
614 grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, e4b->bd_group);
615 buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
On line 592, buddy is fetched by mb_find_buddy() with order 0, between
line 593 to line 615, buddy is not changed, therefore there is
no need to fetch buddy again from mb_find_buddy() with order 0 again.
We can safely remove the second mb_find_buddy() on line 615.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <bosong.ly@taobao.com>
Cc: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index d5b372c..458dce0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -612,7 +612,6 @@ static int __mb_check_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, char *file,
MB_CHECK_ASSERT(e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments == fragments);
grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, e4b->bd_group);
- buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
list_for_each(cur, &grp->bb_prealloc_list) {
ext4_group_t groupnr;
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa;
--
1.7.3.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-06 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-06 4:53 Coly Li [this message]
2011-02-24 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] mballoc: remove unncessary mb_find_buddy() Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4E2961.6020007@coly.li \
--to=i@coly.li \
--cc=alex@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.