From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn6O8-00068F-Ra for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:31:04 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E878EA5671; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:29:59 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLK7q8D4K-1f; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:29:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0363EA50F6; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:29:58 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D525ED2.7020000@xora.org.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:30:58 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steffen Sledz References: <4D4BE849.9070704@dresearch.de> <4D5247CD.20700@dresearch.de> <4D525A03.2020601@xora.org.uk> <4D525D27.5030902@dresearch.de> In-Reply-To: <4D525D27.5030902@dresearch.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IMOFbmdzdHLDtm0gdmVyc2lvbnM/?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:31:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/02/2011 09:23, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Am 09.02.2011 10:10, schrieb Graeme Gregory: >> On 09/02/2011 07:52, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>> Am 04.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Steffen Sledz: >>>> I'm a bit confused about the Angstrom versions. >>>> >>>> Setting in local.conf is >>>> >>>> DISTRO =3D "angstrom-2008.1" >>>> >>>> but bitbake reports >>>> >>>> Build Configuration: >>>> BB_VERSION =3D "1.10.2" >>>> METADATA_BRANCH =3D "testing-next" >>>> METADATA_REVISION =3D "3a7b93a" >>>> TARGET_ARCH =3D "arm" >>>> TARGET_OS =3D "linux-gnueabi" >>>> MACHINE =3D "hipox" >>>> DISTRO =3D "angstrom" >>>> DISTRO_VERSION =3D "2010.7-test-20110204" >>>> TARGET_FPU =3D "soft" >>>> >>>> Is this intented? >>>> >>>> BTW: Which is the suggested/released =C3=85ngstr=C3=B6m version? htt= p://www.angstrom-distribution.org/ seems to be not very helpful here. e.g= . the FAQ link results in an PAGE NOT FOUND. :( >> 2008.1 is the "stable" version of Angstrom which has all the benefit o= f >> our extensive toolchain testing. >> >> 2010.x is angstrom-next and is the in progress version moving to gcc 4= .5 >> blah blah blah. > OK, but why bitbake reports DISTRO_VERSION =3D "2010.7-test-20110204" i= f it is set to DISTRO =3D "angstrom-2008.1" ??? > Because thats the actual version of the DISTRO produced. We discovered if we rename the file people dont read emails or error messages and waste a week debugging non issues so we stopped renaming the file. Graeme