From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] xl disk configuration handling
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:26:53 -0500
Message-ID: <4D52DC6D.7070208@gmail.com>
References: <4D5060EB.3060109@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D5060EB.3060109@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> Refactor xl disk configuration handling.
> 
> Patch 1/5 - "Xl Disk Configuration Option" documentation
> Patch 2/5 - Xl interface change plus changes to code it impacts
> Patch 3/5 - Xl disk configuration parsing changes
> Patch 4/5 - Xl block-attach refactoring to reuse xl parsing code
> Patch 5/5 - More disk validation checks
> 
> Note:  I am nervous about this patch series as the changes are huge and I am
> worried about regressions especially this close to 4.1.  I can try and fix the
> regressions fast but only after they are found and reported.  So, I would
> encourage folks to run their standard config files that they knew worked before
> against the latest changes and report any/all regressions.  Thanks!
> 
Note: Upon further discussion a decision was made to go with patches 1 & 2 for
4.1 and the rest will be reposted for 4.2 and would include relevant review
comments.

Kamala