On 02/10/2011 06:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:03:23 -0800 (PST)
>
>> From: Xiaotian feng<dfeng@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed,  9 Feb 2011 18:52:49 +0800
>>
>>> From: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> commit a512b92 adds sysfs entry for net device group, but
>>> before this commit, tun also uses group sysfs, so after this
>>> commit checkin, kernel warns like this:
>>>      sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/virtual/net/vnet0/group'
>>>
>>> Since tun has used this for years, rename sysfs under tun might
>>> break existing userspace, so rename group sysfs entry for net device
>>> group is a better choice.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@redhat.com>
>>
>> I don't think we have much choice in this matter, so I have applied
>> this patch, thanks!
>
> Wait, you didn't even build test this patch?!?!?!?!
>
> net/core/net-sysfs.c: In function ¡format_netdev_group¢:
> net/core/net-sysfs.c:298: error: ¡const struct net_device¢ has no member named ¡netdev_group¢
> net/core/net-sysfs.c: At top level:
> net/core/net-sysfs.c:333: error: ¡show_group¢ undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> "RFC" doesn't preclude you from at least build testing patches you
> post.
>
> Sigh...
>
Sorry, my bad ... v2 patch is attatched, I've built and r/w this renamed 
sysfs, all work fine now. Sorry again about my carelessness ...

Regards
Xiaotian
>
>