All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
To: "Haefliger, Juerg" <Juerg.Haefliger@hp.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Block IO throttling disabled in distros
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:21:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D543AD6.4000908@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59DD1BA8FD3C0F4C90771C18F2B5B53A653FF72FB5@GVW0432EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net>

On 02/08/2011 12:24 AM, Haefliger, Juerg wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:33:38PM +0000, Haefliger, Juerg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Both RHEL6 and Ubuntu 10.10 have block IO throttling disabled in
>> their kernels. Does anybody know why that is? Are there performance or
>> stability issues with the throttling controller or does it somehow
>> negatively interfere with the rest of the kernel and/or system?
>>
>> Block IO throttling support was not even upstream at that time hence
>> you don't see it.
>
> Duh! I thought I checked that the code was there but just not enabled. I just double-checked and sure enough block IO throttling is not in the RHEL6 kernel source. Sorry for the noise.
>
> Thanks
> ...Juerg
>
>
>> I have not heard about any stability issues so far. Of course more
>> testing will reveal that.
>>
>> The only thing I have thinking is that should we limit the number of
>> bios queued per IO context on the device. Currently there is no such limit
>> and one can queue up as many bios as one want to.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vivek
> --

CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING=y in what will be Ubuntu 11.04

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com

      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-10 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07 15:33 Block IO throttling disabled in distros Haefliger, Juerg
2011-02-07 16:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-08  7:24   ` Haefliger, Juerg
2011-02-10 19:21     ` Tim Gardner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D543AD6.4000908@canonical.com \
    --to=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=Juerg.Haefliger@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.