All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:54:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5488D5.2020607@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D54844B.4010007@zytor.com>

On 02/10/2011 04:35 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 03:57 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 02/10/2011 03:48 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> On 02/08/2011 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> On 02/07/2011 07:12 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>> why punishing native path with those checking?
>>>>>
>>>> What happens if you end up with a reserved range in an unfortunate place
>>>> on real hardware?
>>>
>>> Yes, exactly.  The reserved region code isn't very useful if you can't
>>> rely on it to reserve stuff.
>>
>> assume context is under:
>> moving cleanup_highmap() down after brk is concluded, and check memblock_reserved there.
>>
>> one case for that: native path, bootloader could put initrd under 512M. and it is with memblock reserved.
>> if we check those range with memblock_reserved, initial kernel mapping will not be cleaned up.
>>
>> or worse if we are checking if there is any range from __pa(_brk_end) to 512M is with memblock reserved to decide
>> if we need to clean-up highmap. it will skip for whole range.
>>
> 
> I'm afraid I simply can't parse the above.

1. we have patch that will move down cleanup_highmap, and it will clean initial mapping from _brk_end to 512M (before we have two steps: clear _end to 512M and then _brk_end to _end)

2. So checking memblock_reserved with _brk_end to 512M will cause problem:
   a. will check 256 times less.
   b. if bootloader put initrd ramdisk overlapped with [_brk_end++, 512M), and overlap range will make clean_highmap bail out early. because those range is memblock_reserved.

BTW: Do we really need to cleanup initial mapping between _brk_end to _end?

origin patch from jan:

commit 498343967613183611ac37dccb2846496d954c06
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Date:   Wed May 6 13:06:47 2009 +0100

    x86-64: finish cleanup_highmaps()'s job wrt. _brk_end
    
    With the introduction of the .brk section, special care must be taken
    that no unused page table entries remain if _brk_end and _end are
    separated by a 2M page boundary. cleanup_highmap() runs very early and
    hence cannot take care of that, hence potential entries needing to be
    removed past _brk_end must be cleared once the brk allocator has done
    its job.
    
    [ Impact: avoids undesirable TLB aliases ]
    
    Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
    Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index fd3da1d..ae4f7b5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/page_types.h>
 #include <asm/sections.h>
+#include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
@@ -304,8 +305,23 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-       if (!after_bootmem)
+       if (!after_bootmem && !start) {
+               pud_t *pud;
+               pmd_t *pmd;
+
                mmu_cr4_features = read_cr4();
+
+               /*
+                * _brk_end cannot change anymore, but it and _end may be
+                * located on different 2M pages. cleanup_highmap(), however,
+                * can only consider _end when it runs, so destroy any
+                * mappings beyond _brk_end here.
+                */
+               pud = pud_offset(pgd_offset_k(_brk_end), _brk_end);
+               pmd = pmd_offset(pud, _brk_end - 1);
+               while (++pmd <= pmd_offset(pud, (unsigned long)_end - 1))
+                       pmd_clear(pmd);
+       }
 #endif
        __flush_tlb_all();
 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-11  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 15:18 [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-02 20:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-03  5:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-03 11:25   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-03 17:02     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-04 11:35       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-05  1:18         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-06  7:02           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06  7:30             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-06 17:49               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06 19:24               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:50                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 18:04                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 18:58                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 19:18                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 21:56                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08  3:12                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08  4:56                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08  5:09                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:55                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 19:24                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 20:26                                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 19:34                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-10 23:48                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-10 23:57                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-11  0:35                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-11  0:54                                     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-02-14 16:26                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-14 17:55                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 17:58                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-14 18:09                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 20:02                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-16 17:36                                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08  5:16                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:03                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 16:04                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:02           ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D5488D5.2020607@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.