From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpauth17.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.29]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Po1SO-0004Rb-MR for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:27:17 +0100 Received: (qmail 22429 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.242.7.132) by smtpauth17.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.29) with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4D55B139.4020503@mwester.net> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:59:21 -0600 From: Mike Westerhof User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1297447579-5311-1-git-send-email-filip.zyzniewski@gmail.com> <4D557DED.5070606@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH] initscripts: handle busybox version of makedevs properly. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:27:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/11/2011 3:10 PM, Filip Zyzniewski wrote: > On 2/11/11, Tom Rini wrote: > >> Is there a syntax that works for both? > > I've looked at the source code of both versions and there is no > compatible syntax. Hmmm... perhaps this means that the more correct fix would be to create a patch for busybox that would bring it into line with the syntax of the real application? -Mike (mwester)