From: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Vinicius Piccoli <viniciuspiccoli@gmail.com>,
herton@mandriva.com.br, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: REALTEK 8187SE
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:25:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D560BCC.7070104@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D55FC96.50305@lwfinger.net>
Larry Finger wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 08:44 PM, Vinicius Piccoli wrote:
>> Dear Friends
>>
>> I'm newbee in UBUNTU I have install 10.1 in my netbook, I have a
>> realteck 8187SE,
>> but can not make the wireless work, do you guys have a driver of
>> sofwarecontroler for it?
>>
>> The LAN is working fine!
>
> There is a driver in drivers/staging that has been there for quite a
> while. I'm not sure what kernel it first appeared in, but I know it is
> in 2.6.34. If Ubuntu does not enable it, then you will have either
> change distros, or build your own kernel.
>
> Larry
>
According to wireless-testing's log, the first kernel which a version of the
8187se staging driver is included is 2.6.29 .
The 8187se staging driver is essentially the same as the Realtek rtl8187se
vendor driver which is available as a standard-alone download (i.e. without the
rest of the kernel source tree, and build-able as such) from a variety of
on-line places, not least Ubuntu's laundpad as attachment to a few
bug/enhancement reports.
AFAIK, the 8187se is quite a different beast and uses the PCI interface and
closer to the 8180/8185(?), rather than the USB interface like the 8187L/8187B.
However, I found a few issues concerning your e-mail problematic:
1) You have obviously worked out that the 3 of us are the current 8187/8187B
maintainers, which suggests that you are not as newbie as you like us to believe
- all the 8187se info are available in the linux-wireless mailing list archive,
really, and you could have found the same info we gave you by similiar methods
you found our e-mail addresses. I am not your friend. I really do not know you.
2) I can't speak for the others, but I generally do not like people e-mailing me
privately (i.e. without CC'ing a relevant mailing list) on reasonably widely
applicable open-source issues. A private answer to a private question benefit
nobody else. That's the purpose of having mailing lists and mailing list
archives are for. If I want to receive e-mails from random unknown individuals
privately, I would charge them for it.
Hin-Tak
parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-12 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <4D55FC96.50305@lwfinger.net>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D560BCC.7070104@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=htl10@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=herton@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viniciuspiccoli@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.