From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 7.26.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.40.147] helo=26.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp24P-0001f5-Fw for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:18:41 +0100 Received: (qmail 8257 invoked by uid 503); 14 Feb 2011 15:45:15 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail611.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 26.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 15:45:15 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 18:17:34 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 18:17:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4D59559C.4010301@eukrea.com> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:17:32 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1297606132-19861-1-git-send-email-filip.zyzniewski@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 6168805590944099657 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.500012/N Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-firmware: split into bus specific packages. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:18:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 14/02/2011 16:58, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 14:08, Filip Zyzniewski > wrote: >> The whole reposotiry is about 24MB in size and it's rarely needed >> whole. It is now splitted into bus specific subpackages (and some >> device-specific for devices on a bus like SPI or SBUS) all depended >> on by the linux-firmware package. > > I agree that this ought to be split but I think that it should be done > by vendor: > realtek, ralink and so on. > also there is an other version of this recipe in recipes/firmwares/linux-firmware.inc which is already splitted in small packages for some firmware such as : firmware-atheros-ar9271.bb firmware-marvell-sd8688_10.38.1-p25.bb Eric