All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@upmc.fr>
To: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	Bernard Pidoux F6BVP <f6bvp@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ROSE] AX25 packet routing improvement
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:52:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D596BC9.4030509@upmc.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF78B70.4060907@free.fr>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

Hi,

Here is a second try for this patch that completes the previous one.

[PATCH] [ROSE] [AX25] finding routes simplification

With previous patch, rose_get_neigh() routine
investigates the full list of neighbor nodes
until it finds or not an already connected node whether
it is called locally or through a level 3 transit frame.
If no routes are opened through an adjacent connected node
then a classical connect request is attempted.

Then there is no more reason for an extra loop such
as the one removed by this patch.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>

[-- Attachment #2: af_rose.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 727 bytes --]

--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c	2010-12-09 23:17:27.000000000 +0100
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c	2010-12-19 15:06:44.399455216 +0100
@@ -803,7 +803,6 @@
 
 		rose_insert_socket(sk);		/* Finish the bind */
 	}
-rose_try_next_neigh:
 	rose->dest_addr   = addr->srose_addr;
 	rose->dest_call   = addr->srose_call;
 	rose->rand        = ((long)rose & 0xFFFF) + rose->lci;
@@ -865,12 +864,6 @@
 	}
 
 	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
-	/* Try next neighbour */
-		rose->neighbour = rose_get_neigh(&addr->srose_addr, &cause, &diagnostic, 0);
-		if (rose->neighbour)
-			goto rose_try_next_neigh;
-
-		/* No more neighbours */
 		sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 		err = sock_error(sk);	/* Always set at this point */
 		goto out_release;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-14 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-02 12:05 [PATCH] [ROSE] AX25 packet routing improvement f6bvp
2010-12-20 18:11 ` f6bvp
2011-01-21 11:23   ` f6bvp
2010-12-21 10:38 ` Can AX25 socket debug message be removed ? f6bvp
2010-12-21 17:33   ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2010-12-22  9:43     ` Bernard Pidoux F6BVP
2011-02-15 14:25     ` f6bvp
2010-12-21 10:41 ` Can ROSE " Bernard Pidoux
2011-02-14 17:52 ` Bernard Pidoux [this message]
2011-02-14 21:35   ` [PATCH] [ROSE] AX25 packet routing improvement David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-02 11:33 f6bvp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D596BC9.4030509@upmc.fr \
    --to=bernard.pidoux@upmc.fr \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f6bvp@free.fr \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.